In the article " The Big Bang Didn't Need God to Start Universe, Researchers Say " from SPACE.COM, it refers to a conference called SETICon 2 during a discussion titled "Did the Big Bang Require a Divine Spark?" on June 23, 2012. It briefly summarizes the contention that the findings of the Standard Big Bang Model often referred to by theists arguing for the existence of a creator and comments made by panelists at the conference in reference to research done on quantum fluctuations and loop quantum gravity models. It’s referring to two primary scientific studies that are represented in many different papers, the Standard Big Bang Model and Loop Quantum Gravity. Without going into too much detail, the summary of the studies is around the evidence of the universe being in a constant state of expansion and cosmic microwave background radiation, suggesting the universe was in a state of infinite density and violently expanded. This is the Big Bang. This standard
Posts
In this post you will be reading a conversation with Chat GPT when it was newer to the public and was much more sensational. I will try to get GPT to admit God exists through logical argumentation. While accomplishing this doesn't impact the truth value over the proposition "God Exists", having a language AI system interact with the logic I propose can help provide clarity without real time human prejudice. Even though AI can have bias intrinsic in its intended protocols, they can be easily avoided by exploiting other protocols built in designed to keep language AI useful.
"Does neuroscience show us that religious belief is just caused by particular brain activations? If so, does this present a problem for those who believe in God?" In this article, I will be addressing the presented question about the claims of neuroscience and the findings of the empirical data providing rational grounds to reject any forms of religious or theological beliefs.